I tested both. Both are sharp at near to mid distance. Edge performance is similar too. Both have CRC, f/2 lens CRC is in front, f/2.8 lens CRC is at the rear.
Cant really split which is really better, newer f/2.8 have Nikon SIC coating which gives better contrast, the lens element looks purplish. Early f/2 no Nikon SIC coating.
I went with f/2 because I shoot indoors.
Here is a link to a short write up of both lens for your reference.
http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html
Here is a link to the serial numbers & date of manufacture.
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html#28
Cant really split which is really better, newer f/2.8 have Nikon SIC coating which gives better contrast, the lens element looks purplish. Early f/2 no Nikon SIC coating.
I went with f/2 because I shoot indoors.
Here is a link to a short write up of both lens for your reference.
http://www.naturfotograf.com/index2.html
Here is a link to the serial numbers & date of manufacture.
http://www.photosynthesis.co.nz/nikon/serialno.html#28
Last edited: